Homeland Security Phase Essay

The risk of terrorism has especially been last following the September 11, 2001, round of ravishs. The administration and the people do harbour an inherent fear of terrorism, and the government and taken up many class and policies to counteract terrorism. The role of public in the way it could help proscribe terrorism and reduce the risk is still being assessed. Besides, the terrorist organizations possess besides shifted their atomic number 18as of interest due to several reasons including a stronger stance by the government and the law-enforcing agencies, destruction of several of the terrorist bases and finances, and greater utilize of terrorists on creating losses in terms of man and money.Following the 9-11 outpourings, the top leadership of several terrorists organizations has been weakened. These organizations drive shifted their leadership from a centralized system to a peripheral one. Although, the chances of duplicate attacks are less, there are increased chance s of isolated incidents. However, these can fill a huge toll in terms of human life. aft(prenominal) the happenings of September 11, the security in several parts of the US has been advanced. The succeeding(prenominal) flights and airports have been thoroughly checked. As the security levels become more and more harder, the terrorists aim at softer targets (by which people would be completely caught unaware). These terrorists groups aim at item targets (such as hotels, places of worship, shopping malls, airports, aircrafts, etc), where the toll on humans is lavishly (Dixon & Reville).It is important that the risk of a terrorist threat not only be identified, but in any case develop a plan to manage the risk. The centering of the entire terrorist threat should be done in three steps. These complicate 1. Identification of the threat and assessment of the initial site/s The face, temper and the probability of a terrorist attack should closely be assessed. The cognizance ag encies would have some measures in place by which such risks are identified. They should also consider attacks on soundly-protected structures. The law-enforcing agencies should get hold of a site assessment of the apparent terrorist location to determine the level of protection that is actually present and the period to which it can be improved. In this case, as the terrorist group is against capitalism, they would mostly attack a famous business building in the US City.2. perspicacity of the risks The effects of the terrorist attack on a probable location should be closely assessed. Some of the common analysis that is conducted includes analysis of fickles and blasts, and threats arising from nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Building and structures are closely assessed using the blast and explosive analysis. The agencies should conduct a detailed analysis of how the building would react to an explosive, and the amount/type of explosives that would be require to com pletely collapse the building. Specialized software tools are usually utilized. Accordingly, the agencies can look out for the presence of such explosive in the building.3. Management of the risks This is similar to management of any other mishap such as an earthquake or a tsunami. The risks have to be management at several periods depending on what intelligence the agencies would be obtaining. If the intelligence agencies get an idea that at a particular time, a specific building would be attacked, then it would make sure that the building is well protected and that the terrorists are caught. However, if the intelligence agencies do not get a specific idea, then it would have to increase the security measures in ordinary and accordingly plan for an emergency or a disaster, so as to reduce the causalities. Efforts should also be on to reduce the financial risks if possible. Insuring the spoilt areas can do this. (Gould, 2004),One of the theories utilized to counteract terrorism is the polity of pre-emption. According this theory, by acting first, an attack an effectively be prevented. The law-enforcement agencies should use preventive action against the terrorist in order to prevent a life-taking attack. preventative attacks could be considered as a separate law to launch an attack on the terrorist (Embrey, 2003).